James on Whether and When It Is Ok to Believe without Sufficient Evidence

Clifford/James on Whether and When It Is Ok to Believe without Sufficient Evidence Clifford/James argument is devoted to the issue that there are cases when people have to believe the information without additional arguments and proofs. This statement cannot be agreed on as there are no cases when people are to believe others without supportive arguments.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Clifford/James on Whether and When It Is Ok to Believe without Sufficient Evidence specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More It is possible to accept the evidence without any arguments, however, one will still need the argumentation. The acceptance of the argument without support does not mean the belief in it. The belief without sufficient evidence may lead to disappointment in a person who has offered an idea. There are a lot of cases when trusting someone without asking supportive argumentation people were left frustrated at the end when it came out that the opinion of another person was wrong. One of the main reasons why it is impossible to trust without sufficient evidence is that all people have a different vision of life and situations, therefore, being good enough for a person, the issue may seem negative for another one and the arguments may help give a vision of what one is talking about. One of the most spread examples of this idea is the purchase of the service. Having used the services of a master, one person may be satisfied with the work. Chanting the praises of the master, a person may give a recommendation to another one, however, this is a bad idea to believe without arguments. The quality is an abstract notion and different people understand it in various ways. When someone is sure that the quality means the pleasant appearance after the work of the master is completed, others may be sure that quality is the way how the work has been performed, the quality of the materials used, etc. Therefore, it may be stated that the different vision of the quality of a performed work does not all ow people to trust without arguments. Another example of the similar statement is when people give pieces of advice about the vacation. One should not believe without arguments why the place is great for having a vacation as for some people noisy place with active entertainments is an ideal place for spending time while others may believe that a good rest is possible only when a silence is the only support of a person. Tastes differ, therefore, it is impossible to dwell upon absence of arguments if one wants to remain satisfied. When people dwell upon some issues they usually consider their personal point of view from the personal life position. This statement is correct, however, there is no any guarantee that another person has the same life position, likes and visions. Thus, the argumentation is important.Advertising Looking for essay on philosophy? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Both, Clifford and James are sure that there are cases when a statement may be trusted without additional arguments. However, I have provided several situations when the belief without any explanation may lead to complete dissatisfaction, as a result. Various people have different points of view, tastes and a vision of life. These aspects are very important in decision making, therefore, relying on somebody’s statement without any supportive arguments one risks pity about it in the future. Clifford and James are wrong as trusting others without sufficient arguments may lead to disappointment. All the statements are to be supported with argumentation, otherwise, people risk remain dissatisfied and never trust others as having been deceived once people will search faults in other pieces of advice. Nevertheless, the acceptance of the opinion of another person is possible only if one knows for sure what arguments may be offered.